Clinton calls on Trump to release complete Epstein records, saying a person is ‘under protection’

Clinton’s Concerns About Selective Disclosure

Angel Ureña argued that the documents, as released, seem intended to create a misleading narrative by highlighting certain individuals while withholding others.

He stated, “What has been released so far, and how it was released, makes one thing obvious: there is protection happening—though we don’t yet know for whom or why. Bill Clinton requires no such protection, but someone else may be benefiting from selective disclosure.”

According to Ureña, the DOJ’s decision to black out significant portions of the documents, sometimes leaving entire pages completely redacted, undermines public confidence in the justice system.

The spokesperson also highlighted the apparent omission of other federal records related to multiple investigations involving Epstein, records which should have been disclosed under the Epstein Files Transparency Act.

The Act, passed by Congress last month, was designed to ensure greater transparency in all federally held documents relating to Epstein, particularly those involving his interactions with high-profile individuals.

Ureña warned that continued refusal to release full, unredacted files could fuel suspicions that the government is selectively shaping the narrative to insinuate misconduct by individuals who have consistently been cleared by multiple DOJ investigations across both Republican and Democratic administrations.

Photographs and Public Perception

Central to the controversy are photographs showing Clinton in the company of Epstein and Maxwell. These images, some of which date back over two decades, have circulated widely in both mainstream media and social media platforms.

Although inclusion in the photographs does not constitute evidence of illegal activity, their selective presentation can create misleading impressions, according to Clinton’s team.

Ureña pointed out that the timing and prominence of these photos in the public release appear to implicitly cast suspicion on Clinton, despite no factual basis for any allegations.

“The files themselves do not prove wrongdoing, yet the way they were disclosed can distort public perception,” he said.

Social media reactions following the release were immediate and polarized. Many users speculated about Clinton’s relationship with Epstein, while others highlighted the lack of context provided by the redacted documents.

Ureña’s response sought to emphasize the importance of full transparency to prevent the spread of misinformation and unwarranted character attacks.

Continue reading…