ADVERTISEMENT
Despite these statements, Erick remains unconvinced. She argues that there are inconsistencies in the official explanation of her son’s death that were never fully addressed. She points to unanswered questions regarding timelines, documentation, and the handling of her son’s remains. From her perspective, the museum’s denials fail to address broader concerns about how human bodies can move between borders, institutions, and private collections with limited transparency.
Over the years, Erick has filed complaints, spoken publicly, and shared her story online, where it has resurfaced and gone viral multiple times. Each resurgence sparks renewed debate, skepticism, and public attention. Some people believe her claims stem from unresolved grief intensified by the shock of encountering such a graphic exhibit. Others argue that her concerns raise valid questions about oversight and accountability within the global body exhibition industry.
Continue reading…
ADVERTISEMENT